| Fornero | |
| 2 | The Subject 2.3. Subject clitics: paradigms Example No. 1 2.7. Nominal, phrasal, and meteorological expletivesi ˈdɔrm i ɔ durˈmi
ti ˈdørmi t e durˈmi
al/ la ˈdɔrm l a durˈmi
i durˈmuma i uma durˈmi
i durˈmi: i durˈmi
i ˈdɔrmu i on durˈmi
a ˈpjɔu a pjuˈvy Example No. 2 2.8. Common lexicalizations of multiple forms in the paradigma. ˈdɔpu a ˈvoɲ i maˈtaidopo ClS viene i bambini
a ˈɲy i maˈtai ha venuto i bambini
b. a ˈpjɔuClS piove
a pjuˈvy ha piovuto
c. l e ˈmei tʃaˈma-lClS è meglio chiamar-lo
a saˈres ˈmei tʃaˈma-l ClS sarebbe meglio chiamar-lo 2.8.2. Common lexicalizations of multiple forms in the paradigm Example No. 3 2.8.3. Structure of verb inflectioni kraˈdeva ClS credevo, etc.
ti kraˈdevi
al kraˈdeva
i kraˈdeu
i kraˈdevi
i kraˈdeu Example No. 4 b. i ˈkrotClS credo, etc.
ti kriði
al ˈkrot
i kraˈduma
i kraˈdi:
i ˈkrodu |
| 3 | The Structure of the Complementizer: Interrogative, Relative Clauses, and Aspects of Subordination 3.2. Partial interrogatives introduced by the wh- conjunction 3.2.1. Partial interrogatives introduced by the wh- conjunction Example No. 5 a. ko ˈl ɛ ke ti ˈfɛ?cosa ClS è che ClS fai?
kwo l ɛ ke ti ˈkriði k a l ˈfaga? cosa ClS è che ClS credi che ClS faccia?
anta l ɛ ke ti ˈdørmi? dove ClS è che ClS dormi? |
| 5 | The Auxiliary 5.3. Auxiliary selection, participle agreement, and interactions with "si" Example No. 6 5.10. The existential construction and locative inaccusative constructionsa. i m ɔ laˈva/laˈvaaClS mi ho lavato/lavata, etc.
ti t a laˈva/laˈvaa
a s a laˈva/laˈvaa
i n uma laˈvɛ/laˈvai
i v i laˈvɛ/laˈvai
i s on laˈvɛ/laˈvai
i m eva laˈva/laˈvaa ClS mi avevo lavato/lavata, etc.
ti t eva laˈva/laˈvaa
a s eva laˈva/laˈvaa
i n eu laˈvɛ/laˈvai
i v evi laˈvɛ/laˈvai
i s eu laˈvɛ/laˈvai Example No. 7 a ˈg ɛ i maˈtai ClS c'è i bambini |